|
It is a well-known fact that music affects moods and plays a vital role in curing disease. Both Hegel and Arthur Schopenhauer believed that in some respects music is more effective and useful than any language invented by man. Music helps to deal with and counteract sorrows, disappointments, depressions and emotional upheavals in life. It helps eliminate negative emotions and enhance positive emotions. It seems to work on the principle of "like cures like." "Are you short-tempered and prone to bouts of anger? Then try listening to any of these ragas: Atana, Deepak, Gauri Manohari, Hamsadhwani, Sankarabharanam, Simhendra Madhyama or Todi among others," urges T. V. Sairam (Dignity Dialogue, December 2003). He has shown that "a musical form representing a certain emotion could help to destroy the very same emotion." Thus, "listening to a fiery composition of Vivaldi...representing the moods of rage can actually melt away years of accumulated anger and frustration in an individual." It appears that curing the disease amounts to restoring the disturbed harmony. All biological activities follow definite cycles and involve certain rhythms. Disease is caused by disturbance in these cycles and rhythms. H.P.B. writes in Isis Unveiled about the power of music over human beings and animals. She affirms that the philosophers of antiquity knew about the singular power of music over certain nervous diseases. Music has helped to cure diseases like epilepsy, impotence, insanity, lameness, dropsy, etc., believed to be incurable. Thus:
The spirit of giving, or charity at all levels—physical, mental and emotional—has always been held in high esteem by all religious scriptures. "The best kind of giving involves sacrifice," writes Suma Varughese (Life Positive, December 2003). When charity is not out of the surplus—but involves an element of sacrifice—it leads to inner transformation in both the giver and the receiver. Varughese writes:
The Voice of the Silence describes Charity as one of the transcendental virtues and asks us to step out of sunlight into shade so as to make more room for others. Altruism is the keynote of Theosophy. In the article "Practical Occultism," H.P.B. defines a true Theosophist as he "who finds more joy in helping his neighbour than in receiving help himself; one who is ever ready to sacrifice his own pleasure for the sake of other people...." In The Key to Theosophy, H.P.B. puts emphasis on personal exertion, mercy and kindness, while exercising charity, as that would call forth gratitude in the receiver and "gratitude does more good to the man who feels it, than to him for whom it is felt." The Gita considers the sacrifice of knowledge (Jnana Yajna) as the best and the highest. So does Theosophy. Mr. Judge describes the highest kind of philanthropy thus:
Demographers have observed gradually increasing life spans over the last two centuries. Worldwide, average life expectancy has gone up from about 27 years to more than 65, and in the United States it has shot up from 50 years in the last century to an average of 78 at present. Could we expect children born today to live to be 150? Some researchers support this view, others feel there is no upward limit on longevity. James Vaupel of the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research in Rostock, Germany, predicts that the average life span in industrialized countries will be 122.5 years, in the year 2150. "Most researchers agree that the biggest boost in human life expectancy will not come from curing diseases. Instead, the rate of aging itself has to be slowed down," writes Karen Wright (Discover, November 2003). However, there are many gray areas. Why do our bodies begin to deteriorate when we reach our thirties? It is difficult to explain longevity in terms of genes. There are genes responsible for growth, metabolism and reproduction. But there is no life-extending gene found in the human genome or any physiological determinants of mortality. Steve Austad, a gerontologist at the University of Idaho, ascribes longevity in human beings to "the low-risk environment we have created for ourselves." Geriatrician Tom Perls of the Boston University School of Medicine, feels that those who live to be hundred, lack genes that predispose them to old-age diseases, but "possess genes—as yet unidentified—that protect them from the ravages of time." But is it true? In her comments on łA Treatise on the Yoga Philosophy˛ (The Theosophist, September 1880), H.P.B. mentions that "the greater the number of respiratory movements per minute the shorter is the life-period." "The Elixir of Life," reprinted in "Five Years of Theosophy" (The Theosophical Movement, July and August 1966), deals at length with the subject of "longevity." Thus, in each species—including human—there is a "well-known limit within which the Race-life lies, and none are known to survive beyond it." Even when disease, accidents and famine are avoided, there comes a time "when the particles of the body would feel the hereditary tendency to do that which leads inevitably to dissolution." However, it is possible to live beyond the limits determined by heredity. Thus:
The wayward life of the teenagers in India, is a cause of grave concern. Piali Banerjee and Somit Sen give a graphic description of the deplorable state of the younger generation (Sunday Times of India, January 11). Thus:
Society must play its role too—in leading by experience. "When children see adults achieving success through crooked means, and these same adults being feted by society, naturally, their belief in values goes down one more notch," says counsellor Anjali Chhabria. In a way, the life of teenagers is a mirror of our civilization, with its consumerism, free play to sexual passions, self-centredness, etc. Ever-increasing consumerism, materialism, sexual perversion are all indications of "desire principle" going out of control. The solution lies partly in the adults setting an example. H.P.B. describes our present race thus:
She describes graphically the state of civilization in the 19th century, and the same is applicable to our present civilization. Thus:
What is the best method for reforming the criminals? The World and I (December 2003) carries a Special Report discussing the efficacy of rehabilitation, incarceration (imprisonment) and religious rehabilitation programmes—regarded as the three alternatives. The United States locks up its citizens at a rate of 700 per 10,000, and leads the world in incarceration. It has been found that it is not the most effective way to deter crime. Increase in incarceration is not matched by a corresponding drop in crime. In fact some critics suggest that high incarceration of adults may produce socially destabilizing results—affecting family stability and child supervision—in turn sustaining high rates of crime. Unfortunately, prisons, which seek to improve the character of prisoners, tend to degrade it instead, as they lack empathy and self-control. "How can inmates learn to empathize with the rights, needs, and feelings of others and not view their fellow citizens as mere objects to be exploited or harmed when so many of the guards regard them as objects of gratification, derision and contempt?" Prisons are taking refuge in the conclusion of the research finding—30 years ago—that "nothing works." Recent scholarly literature has challenged the "nothing works" conclusions, claiming that rehabilitative programmes can have a positive impact. Religious rehabilitation programmes have met only with partial success. It is felt that there is no simple solution to the problem. H.P.B. warns against the "nothing works" attitude, as she writes: "Selfishness, indifference, and brutality can never be the normal state of the race—to believe so would be to despair of humanity—and that no Theosophist can do" (The Key to Theosophy, p. 233). Moreover, measures taken should be restrictive and not punitive. No lasting reform can be achieved unless human nature is changed. She writes:
|